Samsung Galaxy M51 Review:

Graphical interface, application, icon: Samsung Galaxy M51 Review: Excellent Battery, Smooth Performance Excellent Battery, Smooth Performance

You may have often encounter the adage that being the proverbial ‘Jack’ of all trades can essentially cause you to a master of none, and successively , rather mediocre. When it involves the smartphone industry, it’s particularly easy to be Jack. Given the components that OEMs have available with them today, you'll likely find it harder to urge your hands on a phone that doesn’t do most things a minimum of acceptably. transcend this, and you've got the simplest in school phones — these do almost everything rather exceptionally well. Then, there are a couple of others — phones which will not be exceptional or stunning, except for what they’re meant for, they’re rather good at. The Samsung Galaxy M51 may be a bit like that. 

Competition during this segment, unlike what you'll have generally thought, is plenty. At Rs 24,999 for the 8GB RAM and 128GB storage variant that we reviewed, the Samsung Galaxy M51 is rivalled by the OnePlus Nord (Rs 27,999), Google Pixel 4a (Rs 31,999) and therefore the 2020 Apple iPhone SE (Rs 32,999) in phones that are costlier than it, and therefore the Vivo V20 (Rs 24,990) that matches it for pricing. If you’re curious about older phones with flagship-grade processors, you furthermore may have at hand phones just like the Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro (Rs 26,999) and therefore the Realme X3 SuperZoom (Rs 23,999). Since this is often plenty to settle on from, does the Samsung Galaxy M51 make any sense to place your money on? 

Design, ergonomics: Sleek, but a smudge/scratch magnet The Samsung Galaxy M51 follows the signature Samsung design — a neat rectangle at the top-left corner for the rear cameras, centrally aligned punch-hole at the front, and therefore the fingerprint sensor embedded within the power button to the proper. While this design remains functional, it does appear as if a design language that’s trickled down from older generation flagships. It doesn't look old, but neither does it look particularly swanky, or new. In fact, during this ‘electric blue’ shade of our review unit, I’d go as far as to mention that it even looks a touch shabby as compared to its competitors, owing in large part to its ‘glasstic’ back panel.

The composite faux-glass rear the panel feels more plastic than glass, and at an equivalent time, attracts both scratches and smudges a touch too easily. it's a touch of a task to stay the phone clean and glossy in the least times, and unless you’re very careful about keeping the phone during a pocket without keys, or picking the proper cleaning cloth, you’re pretty bound to devour a hearty dose of scratches on the rear that just doesn’t look good.  

Despite the heft of a 6.7-inch display, a 7,000mAh battery inside, 9.5mm thickness and 213 grams weight, the Samsung Galaxy M51 doesn't feel very bulky. In fact, because of the graceful, flush fitting of the screen with the remainder of the phone’s body, the Galaxy M51 actually feels quite sleek in hand. It helps that I even have rather large palms to carry it with, and on behalf of me, the side-mounted fingerprint sensor on the facility button felt pretty convenient and straightforward to carry and use. you'll even scroll on the facility button (a feature you get by unlocking developer mode on the phone) for straightforward access to notifications and quick settings. To sum up, if you'll overlook the scratch-prone back panel of the phone, it does desire a premium phone that’s built to last. 

Display, software: Looks nearly as good as you’d want, with one strange quirk The 6.7-inch, full HD+ Super AMOLED Plus display may be a typical Samsung experience. Colors are punchy, sharp, vibrant, and oversaturated on the Samsung Galaxy M51, and not for once does one feel that it's unnatural. because of the natural tendency of AMOLED panels producing higher contrast ratios, the Galaxy M51 produces deep blacks and high sharpness, which contribute to form almost any content look nearly as good as it will, on any smartphone display. Unfortunately, unlike its peers, there’s no fast refresh rate on offer here — it’s good old 60Hz latency all the way.

That should not take anything faraway from it, though. You don’t particularly miss it, and you won’t regret not having a faster refresh rate as long as you don’t use a 90Hz or 120Hz display board alongside the M51. All scrolls look smooth, and most games look and play smooth enough thereon. High frame rate content also plays also because it would on any smartphone display, and there's no evidence of the color shift from acute viewing angles. All of this suggests that the Galaxy M51 a display may be a pleasure to look at both under direct sunlight (thanks to ample peak brightness readings) and in completely dark rooms in the dark. 

The Galaxy M51 runs Samsung’s OneUI interface, which you'll read more about in our review of the Samsung Galaxy M31s. it's matured significantly since Samsung’s TouchWiz days, but there's a weird quirk here. because it so happens, Samsung has not enabled all of its phones to support the haptic vibration engine inside, as a result of which you'll not find any setting to enable vibration feedback for menu operations within the phone. There are many user criticisms about this in Samsung forums, and apparently, this is often a problem with the OneUI firmware on certain Galaxy M series phones. It completely beats me on what compatibility issue must be behind this, but this could be something that a future software update from Samsung should fix it. 

Performance: Adequate enough for many The Samsung Galaxy M51 runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G octa-core SoC, alongside 8GB RAM (it also features a 6GB RAM variant) and 128GB native storage. you'll expand the storage externally by up to 512GB. The chipset in use may be a firmly mid-range one, but because of Qualcomm’s advancements, is sweet enough for many tasks. Multitasking on the Galaxy M51 may be a pretty easy affair, with no undue lags or stutters for normal things like email apps, social media services, cameras, utility apps, and therefore the likes. You can, as an example, juggle between two email apps, three messaging apps, three social media apps, a music streaming app, a note-taking app, calendar, and navigation — and not bat an eyelid.

While gaming, the Galaxy M51 renders most demanding games like our benchmark lot (Asphalt 9: Legends, Elder Scrolls: Blades, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile and Real Cricket 20) fairly well. There are the occasional stutters, like interpolations within the in-game animations and menus, and therefore the frame rates rendered aren’t particularly the very best. However, the core gameplay is rendered in acceptable graphics quality, and therefore the overall games are quite playable here. It doesn't desire a compromise, and therefore the overall gaming performance may be a notch better than what its most up-to-date and direct rival, the Vivo V20, offers. 

That said, the Snapdragon 765G on the OnePlus Nord fares better in terms of core gaming performance, so if you're a gamer, or an all-round computer user, the Nord would be a far better bet for you. If you’re a mean user, there’s no reason why the Samsung Galaxy M51 shouldn't be adequate for your daily usage — particularly since it does all the no-fuss tasks with excellent ease. 

Camera: Fast, reliable but with typical oversaturation The quartet at the rear plays a well-known tune, configured with a 64-megapixel primary, a 12-megapixel ultra-wide, a 5-megapixel macro and a 5-megapixel depth camera. The Galaxy M51 looks fairly adept at shooting sharp photographs in most conditions barring low light, when it tends to push up the color saturation a touch too far in exchange for trying to catch up on the sunshine. However, during a brightly lit environment, the Samsung Galaxy M51 produces good sharpness, good details and slightly oversaturated color tones.a group of palm trees: Samsung Galaxy M51 review - bright and low light© Provided by News18 Samsung Galaxy M51 review - bright and low light

You’d be inclined to forgive the oversaturation, since the general good dynamic range means pretty good detailing of colors and shadows in most situations. However, there's a bias towards warmer hues, which can tend to form photos shot in the early morning look a touch too intense. Beyond this, the 32-megapixel front camera offers you adequate color tone and texture detailing for social media self-portraits. 

Somehow, the Samsung Galaxy M51 doesn't get a 60fps video mode — something that I’ve personally found increasingly handy when creating short videos on phone. The faster frame rate simply makes it easier to urge a smooth movie when editing videos for a 30fps clip, and while the Galaxy M51 can shoot 4K, the absence of a full HD 60fps mode maybe a wee bit disappointing. This, though, shouldn’t be a deal-breaker, unless you’re a content creator trying to find a reasonable, mid-premium range smartphone. On this ground, I’d recommend the Vivo V20 over the Samsung Galaxy M51. If you've got the budget, the Google Pixel 4a is any day a far better camera phone, and at slightly lesser price than the latter, so is that the OnePlus Nord. 

Battery life: The USP is justifiably worthwhile it's here that the Samsung Galaxy M51 blows all competition out of the water. This phone features a gargantuan 7,000mAh battery pack but hardly feels so because of excellent weight distribution across the phone’s frame. I even have often stated that with my scale of heavy usage, I almost never get the claimed two-day battery life that a lot of phone makers say their phones offer. However, the Galaxy M51 came almost on the brink of lasting me two full days as a primary phone, even once I had the camera on very frequently at a recent family event.

The overall battery life will comfortably last you for a piece day-and-half, even with intense workloads of calling, messaging, internet browsing, music streaming, and general high screen-on time. it'll require demanding power users to empty this 7,000mAh battery in at some point. It gets a bundled 25W fast charger that juices it up to 10 percent in 10 minutes, 26 percent in half-hour, and therefore the full one hundred pc in two hours. that's understandable, given the dimensions of the battery. 

I do, however, hate that it gets a dual-side USB-C charging adapter and cable, which reduces the universality of having the ability to charge it with any USB-C cable and still charge fast enough. Of course, you'll still roll in the hay and obtain 10W standard charging if you've got a spare USB-C to USB-A third party cable, but that decreases charging speed by but half. this will quickly become a chore.